Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Co-sign the Open Letter

Want development to work in harmony with nature? Add your name below.

First name

Last name

Your email

Postcode

Tell us why nature and development needs to go hand in hand.

SpmTrp

I am a member of a Wildlife Trust

Keep in touch !

I'd like to hear about The Wildlife Trusts' work via email

Yes

Are you sure? We'll let you know how you can help when nature is under threat if you choose 'Yes'

I'd like to hear from my local Wildlife Trust via email

Yes

Be assured that we will protect your data. You can update your preferences at any time.

It's not "nature or development". It's both.

A Wilder Future helps everyone benefit from and enjoy wildlife near them.

However, parts of the UK Government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill currently threaten nature's recovery in England. This isn’t good for wildlife, or people.

Don’t let this Bill become law without the safeguards needed to protect nature.

The UK Government needs to understand that high-quality, sustainable development doesn't need to be at the expense of struggling wildlife or climate. It’s not a one or the other decision. With some specific changes to the Bill that are easy to agree to now, we can have wilder, healthier homes in the future.

Please co-sign our open letter - you can also add your thoughts about the "nature vs development" debate. This open letter will go to Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with your thoughts included.

After you sign, you can take the opportunity to email the Editor of your local newspaper too. Local media is a great way to highlight your concerns to others. Also, if you mention your MP it's likely that their press monitoring service will alert them to what you are saying, so it is also a good way to get your MPs attention.

Read the Full Letter Here>

Dear Secretary of State,

Planning & Infrastructure Bill: Please change course

The Wildlife Trusts and our supporters work to recover nature, so that everyone can benefit from a flourishing natural world. We have been pleased to work with Government to achieve this, but the Planning & Infrastructure Bill now threatens this shared mission.

Part 3 of the Bill would allow developers to pay into Environmental Delivery Plans (EDPs) to satisfy their obligations when pursuing developments that would impact on features protected by nature laws. The concept could work in some circumstances with strict safeguards, but unfortunately this is not the approach the Government has chosen. Essential protections for nature are now threatened.

The Bill creates no requirements for EDPs to be based on ecological evidence, no requirement to demonstrate that EDPs will significantly improve environmental features, and no requirement to prioritise avoiding harms to nature. In addition to this absence of safeguards, continued inaccurate rhetoric from the Chancellor and the Prime Minister about nature being a ‘blocker’ to development throws significant doubt on the Government’s intentions in bringing the proposals forward.

Committee stage of the Planning & Infrastructure Bill provides a chance for you to change course. Amendments have been tabled by MPs that would require EDPs to be based on scientific evidence, to meet a high legal test, to prioritise avoiding harm and to deliver benefits for nature ahead of damage. We urge you to accept these constructive amendments, along with further nature recovery amendments to other parts of the Bill, including proposals to better protect chalk streams and to designate ‘Wildbelt’ sites. Taken as a package, these changes to the Bill would begin to stave off the threatened environmental regression without hindering the delivery of new homes.

Your department’s willingness to accept these vital amendments at the committee will be the test of whether the Government is serious when it says it wants to preserve and grow space for nature, alongside building new homes for people. If this test is failed, The Wildlife Trusts will be forced to oppose this part of the Bill. Nature cannot afford the blow that Part 3 in its current, unamended state would inflict.

Poll after poll show that the British public agree with us that new homes can and should be delivered alongside the recovery of wild spaces. We urge you to return to this shared understanding, before it is too late.